|
Advertisements
|
Editor-in-Chief: Larry Birnbaum, PhD, FASEP, EPC
An Internet Electronic Journal
Dedicated to
Exercise Physiology as a Healthcare Profession
|
|
|
Boundary Issues in Exercise Physiology
Larry Birnbaum, PhD, FASEP, EPC
Associate Professor
Department of Exercise Physiology
The College of St. Scholastica
Duluth, MN 55811
Exercise physiology is a relatively new addition to the
health science professions. It is so new
that it is still largely unrecognized as such.
This is both a problem and an opportunity. It is a problem because too many employers
are not aware of the capabilities of certified (EPC) exercise
physiologists. It is an opportunity to
the extent that exercise physiologists tap into the many markets available to
them. This requires initiative,
confidence, and some degree of entrepreneurialship. It also requires recognition of professional
limitations or boundaries. There are
some tasks we cannot perform because other professions have claimed them as an
exclusive part of their practice through licensure and/or because we lack the
education and training to perform them.
Still the boundaries for exercise physiology are quite expansive at this
time. Unfortunately, these boundaries
are likely to close in upon us if we do not take control of our own
profession. If we do nothing and wait
for others to do the grunt work necessary to establish exercise physiology as a
respected profession, we will lose the opportunity. Other health science professions will claim
the markets currently available to us.
So, what can we do and what can’t we do? We cannot give shots. That’s an exclusive responsibility of
physicians and nurses. We cannot prescribe
pharmaceuticals but we can prescribe exercise.
Indeed, we are the ultimate health science professionals for prescribing
exercise to several different populations.
Those populations comprise some of our markets. We can work with children (i.e., pediatrics)
who are lethargic and/or obese to improve their well-being and reduce the risk
of future diseases and disorders such as diabetes, heart disease, cancer, and
musculoskeletal problems. We can target
adult populations who are also at risk for these chronic disorders. Of course, a strong educational component is
essential to help them understand why exercise is so important and to help
motivate them appropriately. Individuals
who want to lose weight and maintain a target weight can benefit from the expertise
of exercise physiologists. Exercise
physiologists can help keep elderly persons out of nursing homes or at least
delay entry into such facilities with proper strength training, aerobic
exercise, and stretching exercises. Once
in nursing homes, we can improve the quality of life for residents using
similar protocols. Care providers in
nursing homes will also benefit as residents will be easier to transport. In a nutshell, intervention by exercise
physiologists at just about any stage in life will reduce future medical
expenditures.
However, we do have limitations. We cannot provide all the care the
aforementioned populations require. We
must collaborate with physicians, nurses, physical and occupational therapists
to best serve the client’s interests. As
part of the collaborative effort, we need to recognize when the client needs to
see another health care professional (i.e., know thy limits). For example, if the client injures her
shoulder or knee, she needs to see a physician and possibly a physical
therapist. While we prescribe exercise
for improving and maintaining health, physical therapists prescribe specific
exercises for rehabilitation of an injured joint.
If we are working in a home health care setting, more than
likely a home health care nurse is working with the same clients. It is essential that we communicate with that
nurse to assure appropriate care for our clients without duplication of
services. Similarly, if any client is
restricted in performance of daily activities due to chronic disease or a
permanent injury (e.g., stroke), an occupational therapist (OT) may be working
with that client. It is imperative that
we work with the OT to maximize benefit to that client. We must have a clear and accurate perception
of our role relative to other health care providers.
It would certainly be easier for all exercise physiologists
to know what they can and cannot do if the field had achieved the same
professional status as other health care fields such as nursing. That is, if all educational programs were
accredited by one national accrediting agency and all exercise physiologists
had to pass the same national certification exam, professional responsibilities
would be standardized. Employers and
third party payers would know what services exercise physiologists can provide
to a diverse population of clients. This
is precisely what we need to accomplish to attain professional status. We cannot accomplish this by exercise
physiologists working individually. It
has to be an organized and collective effort.
If you share this vision, ASEP is your professional organization [1]. But you cannot just join and watch the world
pass by. You have to contribute your
time and talent to the effort.
References
1. http://asep.org
|