Fitness,
Beauty, Supplements, and Money
Christa Williams
“Good to the
last drop”, “Best things come to those who
wait”, “What’s In Your Wallet?” and “Mmm Mmm Good.”
Hopefully pictures of Maxwell house coffee, Heinz ketchup, Capital One
credit cards and Campbell’s Soup have come into your mind because of
the powerful medium of advertising. Our lives are bombarded
each day
with advertising to persuade and influence us to purchase various goods,
to
watch certain television shows, and to look a certain way.
Shows like Extreme Makeover on the ABC network makes over
troubled men or women each week with plastic surgery, dental work, and
liposuction all in the pursuit of happiness by looking breathtakingly
beautiful. The Fox Network has the granddaddy of all shows called
The
Swan, where they take women with little to no self–esteem or
self-confidence due to an apparent lack of outward beauty and, similar
to
the ABC program, completely make them over with various surgeries.
At
the end of the show, however, only one woman is chosen to be a
contestant in the Swan beauty pageant. What an awful signal to give
to
these poor women! “You weren’t pretty when we started and you didn’t
make a big enough improvement to compete in a pageant.” No wonder
health books and fad diets are skyrocketing. People want to look
like the
images portrayed in the media. In 2003, diet and health books rang
up an
estimated $500 million in sales [1], not to mention weight loss drugs.
Americans spend over $1 billion a year on over the counter or prescription
weight loss supplements [2]. “Only two, Meridia and Xenical are
approved for long-term obesity treatment” [2, p. 90]. The companies
that
create and sell these weight loss supplements are becoming rich while they
receive tax breaks from the current administrations at the same time.
Magazines, such as Muscle and Fitness Hers or Cosmopolitan, display
countless photos of models, sports stars, and actors giving the average
reader unrealistic views of beauty and fitness. In the Muscle and
Fitness
Hers (April 2004, pp. 52-54), the advertisement for Hydroxycut diet pills
is placed next to or includes photos of ultra-thin and fit looking women.
The photos of these people are likely air brushed to make them look
flawless. “Increased exposure to over sexualized and underfed images
in
the media is correlated with increased dieting and body-image problems
in
girls.” This is a quote from Margo Main [3], a counselor for children
with
eating disorders.
There are so many mixed messages regarding health and wellness in the
media, it is enough to make a person’s head spin. The media
needs to
make a profit just like any other for-profit company. Obviously,
the
primary way for newspapers, television stations, magazines, and books to
make a profit is to increase readership. The hot topic for many people
is
their personal well being and nutrition. The media is able to access
a large
amount of the approximately 8000 nutrition-related research articles
published each year [4]. Advertising along with the journalists (media)
and
the drive for money is the problem. Good advertising is one key to
a
successful product, but not all advertising is good. For example,
94% of
the marketing and advertising materials placed by drug companies have
been determined to lack scientific evidence [5]? Does profit
trump what
is right, and what is ethical? At times, it does and there is no
question this
is true. As long as there are consumers seeking the quick and easy
routes
to loose weight, and as long as there are skilled salesman, there will
always
be a market for nutritional products and services touting solutions.
This
also raises the question: “Why do people believe so much of the nutrition
nonsense?” Some experts believe it is as simple as people believing
what
they hear or what they see in print. Promotional materials are worded
wisely to sound true and scientifically proven. Laws that govern
truth in
advertising are rarely enforced and new products just happen to appear
when existing bogus products are determined not to work.
Dietary supplements, in particular, should be advertised to the public
to
improve a limited number of health concerns. Instead, since the Food
and
Drug Administration (FDA) has only minimum standards for the labeling,
the degree of risk reduction does not need to be stated (except in terms
of
‘may’ or ‘maybe’). For example, the Quaker Oat Bran cereal box
displayed on page 64 of Melvin Williams’s 7th edition of the Nutrition
for
Health, Fitness and Sport text [6], states that Oat Bran [may] reduce the
risk of heart disease. Another government organization, the Federal
Trade
Commission (FTC) holds the authority to remove products from the
advertising world, if they make false claims. The FTC did crack down
on
the “European Weight Loss Patch,” but the FTC is busy with more
dangerous products that appear on the market. This leaves unfortunately,
many misguided nutrition ads that still appear on the airwaves [4].
“Teaming up nutritional science with network marketing
makes an awesome twosome!” – Promotional article for
“Nutritional Systems” in an advertising magazine [4]
Taking nutritional and diet supplements are unnecessary if people follow
a
good balanced diet of a variety of foods. Many of the foods
available on
grocery store shelves provide the public with the essential daily intake
of
vitamins and minerals. And, yet there are many people who take vitamins
and mineral supplements to ward off any possible health problems caused
by their lack of a good diet. They fail to understand that taking
supplements will not fill the nutritional gaps. Only eating better
will fill those
gaps. Vitamins and minerals should only be taken when there is a
need for
them, for instance, pregnant women (iron and folate), elderly (multiple
types), newborns (vitamin k), people with vitamin and mineral deficiency
diseases, and vegans (vitamin B12 and D) [4].
Eat a well balanced diet, throw in some exercise to lose weight and to
stay
fit and only take supplements when absolutely necessary sounds easy
enough right? Why, then, are companies making millions and billions
of
dollars selling supplements? One reason is that people want the quick
and
easy way to lose weight. They don’t want to put much thought or effort
into it. It is easier to reach for Hyrdoxycut that claims to support
weight
loss and reduce appetite, or the new breakthrough formula of Diet Fuel
to
lose weight and gain energy with a great green little pill. Or, how
about
fighting that darn “hunger hormone” with a new miracle pill called Zotrin
without thinking about the possible negative side effects or that the product
is bogus and will not work. As the old saying goes: “If it
sounds too good
to be true, it probably is.” A few more unbelievable advertisements
and
dietary supplements include the following [7, 8]:
• “If you want to take your sport to a new level, start it off
with new Extreme Energy Tech” - it’s a pre-workout drink
to increase your energy levels.
• Xenadrine –EFX: “Real People. Real Science. Real
Success.”
• Nitro-Tech, Cell-Tech – protein shakes and bars
• Body Shaper: “Shake into Shape”
• Dermalin-Apg: “Penetrating Gel Helps Emulsify Fat On
Contact”
• Meso-Tech
• Tetrazene
• Leptoprin – “Helps to overcome the genetic link to
obesity.”
• Detour
• Myoplex Lite
• Carbo Loss
• Keto Ketato
• Taraxatone
• Carb Dynamx
One supplement called ephedrine was a very popular weight loss pill.
It is
now a banned substance. Ephedrine stimulates the central and peripheral
nervous systems, which creates an increase in heart rate, blood pressure,
peripheral vasoconstriction, increased alertness, and an accelerated
metabolic rate [9]. It is estimated that “…at least 3 billion doses
of
over-the-counter ephedrine or extracts from ephedra were ingested in the
United States in 2000.” What was so awful about this little pill?
The
problem is the side effects. Ephedrine is similar to ingesting amphetamines
that produces abnormal heart function, mood disturbances, headaches,
and/or gastrointestinal dysfunction. Athletes, in hopes of obtaining
a
performance edge, most commonly used the amphetamines such as
Benzedrin and Dexedrine but “little to no advantage exists” [9, 10]
Amphetamines are dangerous because they can lead to drug dependency
and cardiovascular disorders with increased dosages. This is common
because the tolerance to it increases with time and the body’s normal
instincts to react to heat stress, pain and fatigue are suppressed.
The
question is how did these drugs make it into the hands of athletes and
the
general public? How much money did the CEOs of ephedrine make at
the
expense to the health and well being of the public? Ethics should
play a
much larger part in this discussion. Why can’t people lose weight
the old
fashioned way with less food consumption and increased activity instead
of
the quick route with pills, which could endanger their health? Why
is it
right for athletes to synthetically enhance their bodies in order to win?
Shouldn’t winning be about one’s own strength and persistence?
The supplement use problem is not only an American problem. A website
[11] found from the United Kingdom entitled “Sports-Supplements”
advertises a beginners guide to supplements and a wide selection of
performance aids claiming to enhance an athlete or the general public
abilities, energy and muscle. The products range from fat loss stacks,
creatine, protein powers and amino acid tablets to carbohydrate
supplements. They claim to build muscle (protein powders), to more
effectively digest protein (amino acids), to give muscles more energy to
move (creatine), and to accelerate fat loss (fat loss stacks). These
supplements and more can be purchased online and shipped right to your
front door! And, interestingly, athletes are also taking part in
the huge
business of supplements. Clever target marketing is taking place
just for
the athletes, because the supplements are labeled as performance
enhancers or ergogenic aids. Williams [6] states that, “It has been
estimated that over 25 billion dollars a year are spent on questionable
health practices in the United States.”
Athletes also take part in some of the questionable health practices, such
as using illegal drugs (steroids and blood doping). Mechanical aids
(equipment adjustments), psychological aids (mental strength),
physiological aids (blood doping), pharmacological aids (steroids), and
nutritional aids (protein supplements) are a few of the classifications
of
ergogenic aids for athletes. It seems that athletes are driven to
win at any
cost. The will and need to win is not only an internal feeling.
There is also
considerable pressure from society and from sponsors as well. The
sponsors will only provide money for the team or individual if the name
of
their product is displayed proudly on the chest, car, or clothes of the
winners. For example, Tiger Woods now plugs Buick cars and Nike
clothing because he is a great golf player and has won major tournaments.
Lance Armstrong is promoting Subaru cars, Trek bikes, the United States
Postal Service, and the Discovery Channel because he is an athletic
machine winning now seven Tour de France biking competitions. Lance
Armstrong has never been tested positive for illegal substances to enhance
his performance, but well-known Olympic shot-putter C.J. Hunter, the
ex-husband of Marion Jones 2000 Olympic gold medalist, was banned
from competition for steroid use [12]. Marion Jones new boyfriend,
Tim
Montgomery, has also been charged by the USADA for using steroids and
other banned substances.
If its not athletes taking drugs, what about the fad diets? The Atkins,
Low
–Carb, and South Beach have become the diet phenomenon in America.
Walk in any supermarket and head into any aisle, what is different?
There
are new lines of products all claiming to be low-carb. There are
now
low-carb breads, salad dressings, peanut butters, jelly, ketchup, cereal,
yogurt, and snack foods. The low-carb industry has put over 1,558
new
products on the supermarket shelves and low-carb companies are
expected to bring in $30 billion dollars worth of revenue in 2004 [13].
Who is consuming all these new products? The approximately 26 million
Americans currently on the hard-core low-carb diet. The average person
spends $85 per month on specialty foods. The ballpark concession
stands, beer producers, and the fast food giants like Mc Donalds, Burger
King, Hardees, and Subway are all adding or adjusting their menus to
reflect customer demand for low-carb and Atkins diet foods. Hardees
landed the superstar baseball player Mark McQwire to promote their new
bunless thick burger. Burger King is releasing a new Angus steak
burger
that is wrapped in lettuce and doused with low-carb steak sauce.
The
downfall of many of these new low-carb menu items is that they may
contain less carbs, but they are likely to be much higher in fat and calories.
Another problem with the low-carb diet world is the FDA does not have a
definition for low-carb, reduced-carb, or light-carb foods.
What about the science behind carbohydrates? The primary function
of
carbohydrates is to supply energy for cellular work [10]. Carbohydrates
are very valuable ingredients in the process of making cellular energy.
Also, in order to process fat for energy, carbohydrates are needed at the
cell level. If the carbohydrate stores become depleted, it greatly
increases
the level of fatigue during exercising. If carbohydrates are cut
back, the
water content in the body is decreased [15]. When one gram of
carbohydrate is lost, that equals 2.6 grams of water lost. The lost
weight
soon returns once the person returns to normal eating because the water
lost with the use of the low-carb diet soon returns.
The Aktins diet was introduced in 1972 [13]. It emphasizes the increase
in
protein and the decrease in carbohydrates. The amount of carbohydrates
is increased as the weight loss slows down. Dr. Atkins claimed that
the
weight loss is due to the state of ketosis, when the body reaches a
fat-burning state from the lack of carbohydrates. The general public
may
be increasing their usage of supplements and/or interest in fad diets to
simply lose weight or trying to emulate the superstar athletes and models
seen on various forms of the media. This speculation has yet to be
proven
correct, but where else do people get ideas that they need to look a certain
way other than what is shown on television, magazines, billboards, Internet
and newspapers? If young girls saw never see images of the
eighteen year
old and now confirmed anorexic superstar Mary -Kate Olsen,
would
they know what ultra-thin is and try to obtain that image through
supplements, fad diets or eating disorders [14]? Eating disorders
are also
another way young girls and women develop to shed a few pounds. More
than 90% of people with eating disorders are women [15]. Amazingly
this
is not just a disease for the average young woman; female athlete triads
are
at the greatest risks for developing eating disorders. Female athletes
involved in gymnastics, figure skating, ballet, diving and various endurance
sports. “The values that certain societies place on female
thinness, the
need to conform to society’s expectations of acceptable body weight and
shape, …are commonly offered as the underlying causes for this (anorexia
nervosa) disorder…” [4].
Ironically, putting all the fad diets and supplements aside, the obesity
rate is
going up higher and higher, with nearly two-thirds of the United States
adults overweight [2]. As of January 2000, 25% of the adult population
is
classified as obese, which means they have a body mass index greater than
thirty. One in six kids from age 6-15 years old are overweight.
The
epidemic of obesity is not just limited to the United States; it is becoming
a
worldwide problem because of the influx of the fast food American
companies into other countries. The increase in types of foods people
are
consuming, especially the increase of high-fructose corn syrup found in
soft
drinks, fast food and with the lack of exercise are the main reasons for
the
obesity increase [2]. In 1969, 80% of kids played sports
every day;
today 20% do [2]. Behind tobacco, obesity is the second leading cause
of
preventable deaths in America [10].
We need to start to rearrange our value system in this country, to take
away the spotlight from the athletes and superstars and place it on the
average middle-class and individuals or groups performing great work in
the world through teaching, engineering, inventing, social justice, and
human services. Put the teacher of the year on commercials
to promote
Subaru cars, Buick, or Nike. Create nationally televised awards
to
people who actually impact the world, not just give us something to watch
on a square box. Create reality shows about poverty in America,
the
inner city school environment, the working poor Americans, instead of the
ridiculous show called ‘Simple Life’ with multi-millionaire Paris Hilton.
What a turn the country would take away from the money hunger, and
beauty obsessed culture we live in today.
References
1. Armstrong, J., Johnson, P., and Duhme, S. (May 2001). The Effect of
Commercial Thermogenic Weight Loss Supplement on Body Composition
and Energy Expenditure in Obese Adults. Journal of Exercise
Physiologyonline. 4:28-35.
2. LeMonick, M. (2004). How We Grew So Big. Time. 6:60-90.
3. McLellan, F. (2002). Marketing and Advertising: Harmful to Children’s
Health. Lancet. 360:1001.
4. Brown, J. (1999). Nutrition Now. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
Publishing. Pp. 3-3 – 3-9, 11-4, 24-2 –24-6.
5. Boone, T. (2004). Cheating in Sports. Professionalization of Exercise
Physiologyonline. 7.
6. Williams, M. (2005). Nutrition for Health, Fitness & Sport.
7th
edition: New York, NY: McGraw Hill. Pp.18-24.
7. Weber, M. (2003). Weight Loss that Works. Muscle and Fitness
Hers. 2:3,13,45.
8. Weber, M. (2004). Muscle and Fitness Hers. 37,46,94,
103-105,114,119.
9. Robergs, R., Boone, T., and Lockner, D. (2003). Exercise Physiologist
Should Not Recommend the Use of Ephedrine and Related Compounds
as Ergogenic Aids or Stimulants for Increased Weight Loss. Journal
of
Exercise Physiologyonline. 6:42-52.
10. McArdle W., Katch, F., and Katch L. (2001). Exercise Physiology.
5th edition: Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
Pp.
140,141,821,550,563.
11. Johnston, R. (2000). Beginners Guide to Sports Supplements.
Sports Supplements.co.uk
12. Hewitt, B., Harrington, M., and Ballard, M. (2004). A Rush to
Judgment. People. 62:71.
13. Kadlec, D. (2004). The Low-Carb Frenzy. Time. 3:46-54.
14. Zwecker, B. (2004). Mary-Kate Olsen Gets Treatment for Anorexia.
Sun-Times. 23 June.
15. Wilmore, J., and Costill, D. (2004). Physiology of Sport and
Exercise. 3rd edition: Hong Kong. Pp. 461 –465, 487-488. |