|
Advertisements
|
Editor-in-Chief: Larry Birnbaum, PhD, FASEP,
EPC
An Internet Electronic Journal
Dedicated to
Exercise
Physiology as a Healthcare
Profession
|
|
|
Questions
Larry Birnbaum, PhD, FASEP, EPC
Department of Exercise Physiology
The College of St.
Scholastica
Duluth, MN 55811
I would like to pose a series of questions for all exercise
physiologists. If you could acquire your
dream job, what would it be? Where would
it be? What is a reasonable salary for
exercise physiologists with a bachelor’s degree? With a master’s degree? Right out of college? With five years of experience? What benefits would you consider to be at
least decent? Do you think continuing
education is important? If so, how would
you prefer to receive that continuing education? What about certification and licensure? Are they important? Do you think if you were certified or
licensed you would have a better chance at getting that dream job and with a
good salary? Should exercise physiology
programs be accredited? If so, what
organization should accredit them? What
standards should be established for accreditation? For example, what curriculum content should
be considered essential in all exercise physiology programs? And who should make those decisions?
These are challenging questions for exercise
physiologists. The latter questions are
particularly difficult because exercise physiology has not yet achieved full
professional status. Progress has been
made over the past few years, but we do not yet have one accrediting agency
that is universally recognized as the accrediting agency for exercise
physiologists. Nor do we have one
certification agency universally recognized as the certifying agency for
exercise physiologists. The key phrase
is “universally recognized.” We do have
accreditation and certification now, which was nonexistent just a few short
years ago. That is progress, but what is
really necessary is for employers of exercise physiologists to recognize
accreditation of academic programs and particularly certification of
practitioners as being valid and essential for employment. In other words, when employers insist that exercise
physiologists be certified before they can be employed, we will have taken a
major step forward.
This leads to two critical questions. What organization should accredit academic
programs? What organization should
certify exercise physiologists? There
are strong feelings about this in various academic circles, but the fact is
that the American Society of Exercise Physiologists (ASEP) was the first
organization to develop an accreditation arm and a certification body strictly
for exercise physiology programs and exercise physiologists, respectively [1]. It is worth noting that ASEP was also the
first organization to publish a Code of Ethics [2] and Standards of Practice
[1]. So why isn’t ASEP universally
recognized as the organization for accrediting academic programs and certifying
clinicians? That is another question for
exercise physiologists to contemplate.
Let us not contemplate too long, though, because while we are
contemplating, other health care professions continue to encroach upon our
scope of practice. Exercise physiologists
who care about their careers should be advocating for legitimate accreditation
of academic programs and certification of clinicians. Thus, the last question I will pose is, ”Do
you care about your future?”
References
1. http://asep.org/services
2. http://asep.org/organization/ethics
|