Including Professionalism in
the Undergraduate Curriculum Through the Use of Observation Hours and
Recommended Readings
Jesse
Pittsley, Ph.D.
Program
Coordinator of Exercise Science
Winston-Salem State University
Winston-Salem, NC
Exercise physiologists who support the
professionalization of the exercise physiology encounter numerous barriers when
attempting to relay this message to others. Exercise physiologists working in
academia, like myself, are no different. One of the most consistent dilemmas
I’ve encountered is the identification of a proper, and politically savvy,
section of the curriculum to broach the topics of accreditation, certification,
and licensure. Current exercise physiology (and more commonly, exercise
science) curriculums are laden with science based courses that offer little room
to address the issues surrounding the professionalization of the field. Unlike
Nursing and Physical Therapy programs, which have complete courses set aside for
professionalism, exercise science programs appear more interested in shelling
out numerous general knowledge courses that focus on historically related
topics. The purpose of this paper is to examine one way in which I plan
to include the topics of professionalism in the curriculum where I currently
teach.
The Exercise Science curriculum at
Winston-Salem State University recently evolved from a physical education
curriculum that had been in place for several decades. Like many Physical
Education curriculums, the program required a one-credit course designed to send
its majors into the community to observe professionals in the work setting.
This course offered an opportunity for students to see several different work
settings before digging deep into the courses of the academic major and before
the student teaching experience. Along with the observations hours, this course
required some journal writing and a final summary paper. Those who designed the
Exercise Science curriculum were wise not to remove this requirement from the
program. Not only are the observation hours a good introductory experience, the
potential for thoughtful analysis significantly contributes to the overall
curriculum.
Observation hours are great opportunities
for students to begin a reflective analysis of the field they are attempting to
join. It is often those hours where the student first learns what an exercise
physiologist does in a “days work.” They allow the student to investigate
different employment sectors. Furthermore, it is a great opportunity to
interact with exercise physiologists and identify the advantages and
disadvantages of working in the field. And finally, observation hours may serve
as a platform to discuss many of the concepts (such as code of ethics, scope of
practice, certifications, licensure, and related issues) that are required by
the different healthcare professions.
Course Design
Since this type of course may vary from program to
program, I felt a brief description of the course would help orientate the
reader. To begin with, at Winston-Salem State, it is a one-credit course that
is predominantly taken by sophomores and juniors in the program. The course
requires 30 observation hours that are preferably divided into two different
settings. As the instructor, I personally require the students to do half the
hours in a “clinical setting” and the other half in a setting of their choice.
I chose to make this stipulation to prevent students regressing into an easy
location placement and from spending all of the hours watching aerobics classes
at a local health club.
To begin the experience, students are
required to make an initial phone call to the exercise physiologist explaining
they would like to observe the person during a section of their work day. I
stipulate that the hours must be scheduled at specific times and days to
discourage the “just show up when you want to” relationship. I ask that the
students arrive in appropriate attire and, if possible, avoid being a
“wall-flower” during the experience. Finally I ask the students to write a
quick paragraph for every 2 hours they observe.
The Addition of
Professionalism
The
observation hours, in combination with the reflective writing, offers a
satisfactory educational experience. But, over the summer months, it occurred
to me that I could make the experience more valuable. I hypothesized that
reflective statements regarding observation hours are likely to become
repetitive and sterile beyond the first few entries. Also, I recall from my own
personal experience as a physical education student how little thought I placed
into those perceived items of busy work. Furthermore, exercise science
students, who have even more of a sparse foundation in professionalism, would
quickly run out of things to write about. In the end it would receive a pile of
journal entries containing little substance. As a result, I felt I needed to
make some changes to spur the students into a deeper analysis.
Traditionally, this type of course meets
just a couple times per semester. One meeting is scheduled to orientate the
student and set ground rules. The second meeting is used to bring closure to
the experience. Since I consider this too limited of interaction, the first
change I implemented was to require to course to meet once every two weeks.
Although this does not sound like a significant change, raising the workload too
high in a one-credit course could potentially create problems within the
department. My next change was to require an assigned reading regarding
professionalism with 5 to 10 short-answer questions due each class period. The
questions are designed to encourage the students to investigate the readings and
move beyond the usual “collegiate skimming.” Finally, the actual class session
is designed to merge talking about the observation hours with the topics
surrounding professionalism.
Recommeded Readings
If you are reading this brief paper you
are most likely acquainted with a couple websites and journals dedicated to
exercise physiology and professionalism. The American Society of Exercise
Physiologist has published a journal dedicated to the professional
development of exercise physiology (Professionalization of Exercise
Physiologyonline) since July
of 1998. In fact, the first few issues of this journal were published before
ASEP ever had its first meeting. For over six years, Dr. Tommy Boone has
constructed essays and invited other authors to publish their analyses of this
topic. Since no other organization has approached exercise physiology in this
manner, this journal is a rather novel publication containing several
significant essays that will likely become cornerstone catalysts of the field's
evolution. Outside this journal, ASEP has published several significant
position stands on accreditation, professional conduct, and licensure on its
homepage that serve as important learning tools. Over the past few days, in
preparation of the course, I started to comb through the manuscripts posted on
both the ASEP homepage and PEPonline in search for a handful of documents I would
like to use in my course. The following is a list and a short description of
some I have identified.
Document #1
ACSM and Exercise
Physiology: Past, Present, and Future
Roberts A. Robergs, Ph.D.
PEPonline,Vol 1 No 1
July 1998
Robert Robergs is the long-time editor of
the Journal of Exercise Physiologyonline (ASEP’s research journal) and, therefore, has
kept his contributions to PEPonline to a minimum. But, as you will see when you
read this article, when Robert Robergs focuses his energies to writing in essay
format, he makes it count. Although I’m young (still under that age of 30) and
I still have a lot of people to meet, I am always willing to argue that Robert
Robergs is the best critical thinker I have met. If Dr. Robergs were to be
given a cube, he would see the side almost all others fail to consider. As a
result, his papers are edgy, controversial, and very interesting. One of the
first articles written for PEPonline was a well-constructed and well-reference
analysis of the evolution of exercise physiology under the rule of the
American College of Sports Medicine. Throughout the paper, he points out
that the relationship between ACSM and the field of exercise physiology was
tragically flawed from the beginning. From the failure to include the term
“exercise physiology” in its flagship journal (which I would argue has worked to
ASEP’s advantage) to the false acceptance as ACSM as the governing body of
exercise physiology. The article examines the history of this ACSM umbrella
organization. Although this article may be a bit politically risky for many of
those in academia, it does require students to view the exercise physiology
hierarchy from a different perspective.
Document #2
The
Dissection of Exercise Certifications
Matthew G. Wattles, MS
PEPonline,Vol 5 No 3 March 2002
A very significant topic for exercise
physiology students is certification. There are over 200 certifications
available for those looking to include exercise in their career. In
consequence, the business of exercise certification is a prime example of
economic free market gone awry. There are a lot of people interested in making
money and academic certifications are no exception. Unfortunately, combining
this with how poorly professors address the issue certification in the
classroom, there are many exercise students plagued with ignorance who are
willing pay the cash for the wastes of paper. Mr. Wattles (who incidently is
now the ASEP President) addresses this issue by critically examining several
popular certifications. He doesn't pull too many punches in the process. For
instance, in response to the American Council on Exercise (ACE) exam he
states:
“It is not necessary to spend a
lot of time critiquing this exam. It is not worthy of a serious critique. The
American Council on Exercise has lobbied against any licensure of fitness
professionals because the majority of their certifications are held by people
who do not have college degrees. Furthermore, ACE’s cash cow comes from the
money that they earn through their certifications. The more people are able to
sit for their exams, the more money earned by ACE.”
I plan to use this article in conjunction with
certification information provided by ACSM and ASEP. Certification is difficult
to address with students. Many employers consistently ask for some form of ACSM
certification in their job postings. I personally disagree with the ACSM
certifications on the premises that they are not exclusionary of other
healthcare professions. This significant falter in logical thinking by ACSM has
drastically hurt the professionalization of exercise physiology. In contrast,
ACSM does have monopoly in the certification market. In short, it would be
unethical not to broach that topic in class.
Document #3
ASEP’s Standards of Professional
Practice
ASEP Board of
Accreditation
ASEP Board of
Certification
Unlike the previous two items, The
Standards of Professional Practice is not an article on PEPonline. Instead, this is an
official document of ASEP designed to orientate the reader to the
responsibilities of an exercise physiologist. In my opinion, this document
separates ASEP from other “interest” organizations in the field of exercise
physiology. Fields such as nursing, physical therapy, and education pay ample
attention to informing their students of proper conduct. The "interest"
organizations surrounding exercise physiology have failed in this objective.
Therefore, in addition to the other important documents that make up the
professional infrastructure of the ASEP organization, the primary purpose of the
"Standards" document was to correct this deficiency. The document should serve
as a cornerstone for every exercise physiology program.
Document #4
The
Exercise Physiology Code of Ethics: A Dilemma or a Standard of
Conduct?
Tommy Boone,
Ph.D., MPH
PEPonline, Vol 5 No 11 November
2002
Teaching the professionalization of
exercise physiology without including an essay by Tommy Boone is like a chicken
being a big fan of Colonel Sanders. It just doesn’t make sense. Dr. Boone has
dedicated the most recent decade of his life to this plight. One could probably
use any one of his essays in such a course. In this article, Dr. Boone examines
each item of the ASEP Code of Ethics for exercise physiology. Many students
have an intuitive understanding of ethics, but this document has the potential
to serve as a great teaching tool to help focus the students’ analysis. I plan
to use this essay in combination with the ASEP Standards of Professional
Practice. Both documents, as Dr. Boone has repeatedly stated should not be
viewed as impenetrable documents that are not open to discussion. Instead, such
documents should be cross-examined much like the Constitution of the United
States. One could argue is that the purpose of professionalism is to question
itself! This essay is a good example of that.
Document #5
Guidelines for the Accreditation of
Undergraduate Programs in Exercise Physiology
ASEP Board of Accreditation
Undergraduate study should always include
an analysis of the academic coursework. Students should understand the overall
objectives of a program. They should also understand where their specific
program falls in the continuum of professional preparation. To initialize this
discussion, I plan to use selected aspects of the ASEP Accreditation document to
draw the students' attention to specific issues and concerns about
professionalism and credibility. Do to the potentially dry nature of this
document, it will be important to have well-constructed short-answer questions
to help guide students through it.
To accompany this document I will use an
ACSM document describing the standards of its Registry of
Undergraduate Programs. Although I view this maneuver by ACSM as an
emergency response to ASEP’s Accreditation standards and, therefore, do not
support ACSM’s decision, the document does a good job of clearly outlining
program objectives and the equipment exercise science programs should have.
Here, at Winston-Salem State, the laboratory equipment is very limited.
Therefore, it is strategic choice of mine to make the students aware of what our
program does not have. I’ve always found it amazing how a few unhappy students
can influence the decisions of college administrators.
Document #6
Questions Exercise Physiologists Should Ask
Themselves
Tommy Boone,
Ph.D., MPH
Finally, to teach the professionalization
of Exercise Physiology, one must address licensure. For students new to the
idea of professionalism, licensure is an advanced topic that is constantly
evolving. Many exercise physiologists see licensure as the answer to all of
their woes. This is a logical conclusion since health care professions such as
nursing, who have a solidified and important role in society, are licensed.
Unfortunately, this type of analysis is an over-emphasis of the “ends” without
enough attention placed on the “means.” Healthcare professions that have
licensure have also established accreditation programs and exclusionary
certification processes. These programs have been in place for quite some
time. Exercise Physiology has not been as productive in its evolution. Few
states have accredited undergraduate programs and those possessing the
exclusionary EPC certification are sparse. As a result, the public has not been
presented with a consistent definition of an Exercise Physiologist. In this
position stand, Dr. Boone takes a step back from the euphoric view of licensure
and offers a much more poignant analysis of this final capstone of most
healthcare professions. This document is a quality teaching tool. It is a
fantastic question-by-question analysis of what licensure can and cannot do for
exercise physiologists.
Final Thoughts
I’ve pondered for several months how I would
include the teaching of professionalism in the program I teach in. Few programs
have designated courses assigned to teach the topics of accreditation,
certification, and licensure. Therefore, most of us will have to be creative
in how we include this material. It my opinion, it is unethical not to teach
about ASEP and about professionalism. Students need to be aware of how exercise
physiology has fallen behind the other healthcare fields, what can be done to
prevent this from getting worse, and what the American Society of Exercise
Physiologists is doing to help students throughout the United States.